Home ] Zoning Information ]

MARSHFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD

Approved Minutes of November 2, 2006

 

Board Members present: James Arisman, Paul Brierre, Tom Daley, and Martin Johnson. Also attending: Mike Fritz, Zoning Administrator Bob Light, Jay Southgate, Brad Washburn, Tonya Morehouse, Kevin Morehouse, Colby Morehouse, Tyler Morehouse, and Molly Johnson (canine unit).

 

At 7:05 pm the Board held an initial meeting with Jay Southgate, who has applied to subdivide his property on Pike Road. He would like to create a small lot of 2 acres or so for the existing home and , and leave the remaining lot — approximately 48 acres — undeveloped. At one point the Board informed Jay that it would not consider his application complete unless all named owners of the property had signed it. He said he would get the other landowner, Kimberly Pierce, to sign off on the plan. When this has been done, the Board will consider the application complete and will issue a Sketch Plan Determination letter.

 

At 7:15 pm the Board heard from Tonya Morehouse, who had some questions about the pending Subdivision/PRD application of Wayne and Susan Kowalski. The DRB had issued a Sketch Plan Determination which stated, among other things, that approval for their PRD proposal “will probably follow only if we see it as having a beneficial impact on the Town’s development objectives.” Tonya wished to know more specifically how the Kowalskis could establish this.

            Tom explained that this passage in the Sketch Plan letter was there for the purpose of warning the Applicants early in the process of the general view of the DRB with regard to PRD applications. Because PRDs actually modify the established Zoning Regulations, the DRB believes that it may grant them only in cases where the proposed development would advance the objectives of those Regulations and of the Town Plan in ways that would not be possible without the modification. It is not to be seen as a loophole through which individual landowners can get around restrictions for personal reasons. The Applicants are entitled to bring their proposal to a Public Hearing, where they can demonstrate that it meets this sort of “collective benefit” objective. Alternatively, they may try to persuade the DRB that its current view regarding PRD applications is incorrect, and that they should be judged by another standard.

            Tonya also asked if the Board would be making a visit to the site. Tom pointed out that they have not yet set a hearing date for the application, but Martin and Bob both thought a site visit should happen soon, before the snow cover. The Board accordingly scheduled a visit to the site for Friday, November 10, 2006 at 9:00 am.

 

At 7:35 pm Paul moved to approve the minutes of October 5, 2006 and October 19, 2006 as drafted. Seconded by James, all approved. The Board then went into deliberative session to discuss several aspects of the pending application of Gruss and Company to create new building lots along Laird Pond Road. Joining in this session was Mike Fritz, who is serving as a designated alternate on the DRB for that application.

 

At 8:45 pm Martin moved to adjourn the DRB meeting. Seconded by James, all in favor.

 

                                                                                                Respectfully submitted,

 

                                                                                                Tom Daley

 

 

Home ] Zoning Information ]