|
MARSHFIELD DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW BOARD
Approved Minutes of July 7, 2005
Board Members
present: Tom Daley, Jon Groveman, Martin Johnson, and
Gary Wilson. Also attending: Zoning Administrator Bob
Light, Trevor Tait, Ellen Cooke, Rob Billings, Mark
Michaelis, David Mulligan, Daniel Mulligan, Timothy
Mulligan, Michael Phoenix, Dimples Mucherino, Dan
Mucherino, Thomas Maclay, Homer Brown, Alan
Christiansen, and Rosemary Christiansen.
At 7:00 pm the
Board opened Public Hearing on the Subdivision
application of Trevor Tait and Ellen Cooke. Trevor
recounted for those present the evolving history of
their subdivision proposal. They had hoped to create
three lots from a parcel of approximately 100 acres that
they recently acquired from Wilmer Brandt. Lots 2 and 3
are comparatively small — 2.5 and 3.5 acres,
respectively — and they wish to build a new house on
each. Upon surveying the property, however, they
discovered that the proposed building area for Lot 3,
situated to the south side of Ennis Hll Road, actually
lies partly on an adjoining lot owned by Rob Billings.
Accordingly, they are now pursuing a plan to purchase a
sliver of property from Rob to add to their own
property, allowing them to continue with their
development plans.
After
some discussion about the procedural complications
presented by this new proposition, the Board concluded
that what it is now being asked to approve is
essentially a subdivision plan to create four new
parcels from two source parcels. One of these resulting
parcels would be all of Rob’s land, less the sliver to
be conveyed to Trevor and Ellen. Another would be a new
building lot consisting of that sliver plus a part of
the property now owned by Trevor and Ellen. The other
two lots would be made up of the remainder of Trevor and
Ellen’s property, including the second small lot
proposed for the other new house.
Because
only a tiny portion of Rob’s lot is being altered by
this proposal, the Board agreed to waive — upon receipt
of a written waiver request from the applicants — the
requirement that his property be surveyed. If approved
by the DRB, the final plan survey to be filed with the
land records needs to show only the three lots that will
be owned by Trevor and Ellen. The Board also requires
that the applicants provide a signed document from Rob
that confirms his agreement to the proposed Subdivision
plan. The applicants will also submit, if and when
received, a letter from the State of Vermont approving
the proposed boundary adjustment between the current
lots. The hearing was closed at 7:45 pm.
At 7:50 pm the
Board opened public hearing on the combined applications
of Christ Covenant Church. The Church has submitted a
Site Plan/Conditional Use application for improvements
to their property on Creamery St. They propose to build
a new, enlarged church building, with new expanded
parking and other site work. Conditional Use approval is
required under the Zoning Regulations because there are
existing slopes in the development area in excess of
15%.
The new
Church building as designed includes a steeple with a
stated height of 99 feet. Zoning Administrator Bob Light
has found that this would exceed the Town’s height
limitations for public buildings in the Village
Residential zoning district. As a result of this
finding, the Church has filed an Appeal and Variance
request to allow construction of the building as
planned.
Board
Chairman Jon Groveman asked the applicants to address
this Appeal first. David Mulligan described the design
of their new church as both beautiful and entirely in
keeping with the traditional look of churches in our
area. He feels that strictly applying zoning height
limits to church steeples amounts to preventing any
future construction of traditional churches. He doesn’t
believe this could really have been the intent of the
Town when it adopted its zoning regulations. Jon advised
the applicants that the Development Review Board would
be bound by what it finds in the regulations and in
state law. Unless the applicants can provide some
evidence that church steeples are in some way exempt
from these rules, or that their particular project can
meet the strict statutory criteria that would entitle it
to a variance from these rules, they may find that the
appropriate avenue would be to make a proposal to the
Planning Commission to change the Zoning Regulations.
The
applicants then went on to describe the rest of their
Site Plan in detail. They stated that they needed
significantly more space to accommodate the growing
families within their congregation. They are not
planning for, and have no expectation of, a sudden
influx of new members following construction. The
property will continue to be used the way it is now: as
a church, a school, and a private buyers’ club for their
members. David stated that they would not consider
allowing use of their property by cell phone service
providers. Dan Mulligan, who prepared the drawings,
fielded questions from the Board and from some adjoining
landowners about the design details. Discussion followed
about the extent of the excavating and regrading that
would be done, and about the way they calculated the
building heights.
At 9:20
the board adjourned the hearing until Thursday, July 28,
2005 at 8:00 pm. The Board will deliberate in the
meantime. If, following deliberation, the Board feels it
needs no further information, they will notify the
applicants that the matter will be closed and a decision
issued without reopening the hearing.
At 9:23 the Board
met with Alan and Rosemary Christiansen about their Site
Plan application for their property on Maple Hill. They
wish to build a new home, which would be the second
residence on their property. Public hearing on this
application was set for Thursday, July 28, 2005 at 7:00
pm. The Board apologized to the Christiansens for the
long delay in scheduling their hearing.
At 9:35 pm the
Board discussed the Notice of Appeal received from Brian
Graves. Bob has denied his Zoning Permit application to
build a house on property on Cabot Road in the
Floodplain and Water Conservation District. Although not
mentioned in Brian’s notice, the Board anticipates he
may end up requesting a waiver from the regulations to
allow this construction. Hearing is set for Thursday,
July 28, 2005 at 7:30 pm.
At 9:40 pm The
Board went into deliberation to discuss the Tait / Cooke
application.
Martin has offered
a couple of corrections to the minutes of June 2, 2005.
At 10:05 pm Tom moved to approve those minutes as
corrected; seconded by Gary, all in favor. Martin then
moved to adjourn the DRB meeting. Seconded by Jon, all
in favor.
|